home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT0264>
- <title>
- Feb. 28, 1994: The Political Interest
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Feb. 28, 1994 Ministry of Rage:Louis Farrakhan
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- THE POLITICAL INTEREST, Page 45
- Playing Nuclear Poker
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By Michael Kramer
- </p>
- <p> Does North Korea have the bomb, and if it does, what should
- be done about it? Kim Il Sung offered an essentially hollow
- capitulation last week, a promise to permit inspections of all
- but the key nuclear sites, which could settle the matter. So
- the world--and Bill Clinton--will be left to ponder those
- questions, perhaps indefinitely. What to do?
- </p>
- <p> First, assume North Korea already has two crude nuclear devices,
- as those who are paid to know such things assume.
- </p>
- <p> Second, understand the key players' views and motivations. South
- Korea, the presumptive first target of any attack from the North,
- is against backing Kim into a corner, a result it fears economic
- sanctions would accomplish. What Seoul wants least is responsibility
- for an economically devastated North. "We're content with a
- divided peninsula," says a South Korean diplomat familiar with
- the huge absorption costs borne by West Germany's embrace of
- the East.
- </p>
- <p> Japan is happy with the status quo too. Tokyo's joint security
- treaty with Washington allows its defense budget to remain low,
- and it abhors even thinking about developing a nuclear hedge
- against North Korea's capabilities.
- </p>
- <p> China welcomes the current confusion as an aid to retaining
- its preferred-trading status with the U.S. "Beijing figures
- its chances improve if it is perceived as the single source
- capable of constructively pressuring Pyongyang," explains an
- Administration sinologist, even though the evidence suggests
- China did little if anything to encourage Kim's latest maneuver.
- </p>
- <p> Finally, despite its public huffing, the U.S. seems to be taking
- North Korea's supposed nuclear capacity in stride. Whatever
- exists is "not militarily significant," says U.S. Pacific Commander
- Charles Larson. Yet, adds the admiral, it is obviously "significant
- politically." Which is why no one tells the truth--neither
- the West nor the North Koreans. "As soon as the bombs' existence
- is confirmed unambiguously," says a State Department official,
- "you have to do something about it. Better to let what is be
- and move to cap it at the present low-threat level."
- </p>
- <p> "North Korea cannot be allowed to develop a nuclear bomb," Clinton
- said firmly last November, no doubt recalling that the last
- time a U.S. Administration got Korea wrong, the body-bag business
- became a growth industry because Harry Truman took too long
- to give 'em hell. "Drawing a line in the sand early is what
- you should have done in the '50s," says a Japanese diplomat.
- "Today you should be softer. Kim's bottom line is still his
- regime's survival, but victory is defined differently this time.
- Kim knows the way to win in the '90s is by joining the Asian
- economic boom rather than by armed conflict. Clinton has already
- made one mistake. He should have told Kim, `You say you don't
- have the Bomb. O.K., we believe you.' Then, quietly, he should
- have begun to deal. Now, when everything is public and so much
- pride is on the line on both sides, it's harder."
- </p>
- <p> But not impossible. "We'll certainly consider trading with them
- if they don't transfer their technologies to other nations,"
- admits an Administration official. "It's the proliferation possibilities
- that really worry us."
- </p>
- <p> So there's the bargain waiting to be struck. If the North is
- really more interested in getting rich than in making war, Clinton
- has a second chance to get it right. Assuming he finesses the
- current crisis, the President should learn the central lesson
- before other bad actors follow Kim's lead. The U.S. should actively
- engage the world's other rogue states before it's too late--no matter the know-nothings whose knee-jerk reaction to creative
- diplomacy is to cry appeasement. It won't always work. It didn't
- with Iraq. But peace prospects grow as fewer states are isolated.
- The time to deal with nuclear blackmail is before those who
- would threaten trouble acquire the wherewithal to make it.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-